FUNDRAISINGfundraisingpre-seed

SAFE Notes in 2025: What's Changed and What Hasn't

The YC SAFE is 12 years old. It's still the dominant pre-seed/seed instrument, but the terms landscape has evolved. A current-state guide for founders and investors.

PK
Priya KapoorPartner, Sequoia Scout Program
May 22, 2025
14 min read

The SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) turns 12 years old this year, and it remains the dominant instrument for pre-seed and seed financing in the US. But the market has evolved significantly from the original vision of a simple, founder-friendly document. Here's where things stand in 2025.

Post-Money SAFEs Are Now Standard

YC's shift to post-money SAFEs in 2018 is now fully adopted. Pre-money SAFEs still exist but are increasingly viewed as unusual. The key advantage of post-money SAFEs for both sides: everyone knows exactly how much dilution a SAFE represents at the time of signing. No more guessing games about how much other money will come in on the same terms.

What's Changed in 2025

  • Valuation caps have increased 30–50% from 2023 lows, reflecting the broader market recovery
  • Side letters are more common — investors increasingly negotiate for pro-rata rights, information rights, or MFN provisions alongside the standard SAFE
  • Some investors are pushing for SAFE + token warrants in crypto-adjacent companies — a hybrid instrument that didn't exist three years ago
  • International SAFEs (adapted for non-US jurisdictions) have matured, with standardized templates now available for the UK, EU, and Singapore
  • The 'stacking problem' — companies raising multiple SAFE rounds before a priced round — has led to more sophisticated conversion modeling tools

What Hasn't Changed

The core mechanics are the same. A SAFE is not debt (no maturity date, no interest), it converts to equity at a priced round, and the cap and/or discount determine the conversion price. The simplicity that made SAFEs successful remains their defining feature.

I still tell every founder: if an investor asks you to negotiate heavily on SAFE terms at pre-seed, that's information about how the relationship will work going forward. The best investors at this stage sign the standard SAFE and focus their energy on helping you build.

Priya Kapoor
2025 BENCHMARKS

Pre-seed SAFE caps: $6–12M post-money. Seed SAFE caps: $12–25M post-money. Discount-only SAFEs (no cap): increasingly rare, typically 20–25% discount. Most-favored-nation (MFN) provisions: standard in first SAFEs, less common in later ones.

The SAFE remains the right instrument for most pre-seed and seed raises. But founders should understand the conversion mechanics, model the dilution impact of stacking, and negotiate side letters carefully. Simple doesn't mean you shouldn't pay attention.

The Stacking Problem: Real Dilution Math

Here's where most first-time founders get burned. Imagine you raise three SAFE rounds before a priced Series A: a $500K SAFE at a $6M post-money cap, a $750K SAFE at a $10M cap, and a $300K SAFE at a $12M cap. At conversion, those SAFEs collectively represent 18–22% dilution — before the Series A investors take their 20%. Founders who modeled each SAFE individually often didn't realize the cumulative impact until the pro forma cap table lands.

Data from 85 seed-to-Series-A conversions in our network shows that founders with 3+ SAFEs outstanding owned a median 41% of the company post-Series A, compared to 52% for founders with a single SAFE. That 11-point gap compounds at every future round and can mean the difference between maintaining control and losing it by Series B.

The Side Letter Trap

Side letters have proliferated in 2025 — roughly 60% of SAFE rounds above $1M now include at least one. The most common additions are pro-rata rights (45% of side letters), information rights (38%), and MFN clauses (30%). Individually, each seems reasonable. Collectively, they can create a web of obligations that slows down your next round. One founder in our network had seven different side letter commitments that took three weeks of legal work to reconcile before their Series A could close.

When a SAFE Is Actually the Wrong Instrument

  • Revenue above $2M ARR — at this stage, a priced round gives you cleaner governance and often better terms than a high-cap SAFE
  • International investors who don't understand US SAFE mechanics — the conversion confusion can kill deals at the Series A
  • Raises above $3M — at this size, the simplicity advantage of SAFEs is outweighed by the governance benefits of a priced round with a board
  • Companies with complex cap tables already — adding more SAFEs to a messy structure multiplies the cleanup cost later
PRO TIP

Before signing any SAFE, model the conversion using a tool like Carta's free SAFE calculator or AngelCalc. Input your existing SAFEs, the new one, and a realistic Series A scenario ($8–15M raise at $30–60M pre-money). If your founder ownership drops below 45% post-Series A, you may want to consider a priced seed round instead.

About the author
PK

Priya Kapoor

Partner, Sequoia Scout Program

Priya has invested in 40+ early-stage startups and previously built two SaaS companies to acquisition. She writes about the intersection of community and capital.

All articles
Weekly dispatch

Get more like this.

One email per week. Tactical insights from founders and investors in the Inner Ping community.